On the fifteenth anniversary of the the day that changed our lives, Bangkok Jack revisits the events in a weekend series of The Jack Report
Something hit the most heavily, and cleverly, defended building in the history of mankind. And the 9/11 Commission Report tells us it was United Airlines Flight 77. And try not to pay too much attention to conspiracy theorists who point to nuts and bolts that do not match because the threads are different sizes, because none of that matters. We all have nuts and bolts in our sheds that do not match because the threads are different sizes, who cares.
Concentrate instead on the bigger questions. Ask the bigger questions. Nineteen under qualified Arabs taking over four American passenger jets armed with nothing more that penknives and hitting three quarters of their targets is the real conspiracy theory. There is no visible evidence, or credible witness evidence that any passenger airliner crashed into the side of the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. Something happened, obviously. But it did not involve Fight 77. The only real information released was provided by U.S. Solicitor General, in the Bush Administration, Theodore ‘Ted’ Olson whose wife Barbara, herself a well-known television personality, was on the flight – we are told.
Now, Olson claims she called him twice from the aircraft at around thirty-minutes before the incident at the Pentagon. He told CNN that his wife had made the calls from her cell phone and told him that, ‘all passengers and flight crew including the pilots, had been herded to the back of the plane by armed hijackers who had knives and cardboard cutters.’ (Remember, this is the U.S. Solicitor General and we already know that cell phones did not work at altitude)
The FBI’s record of their interview with Olson reads that, ‘he (Olson) doesn’t know if the calls were made by his wife’s cell phone or the telephone on the plane.’ However, during an interview with Hannity & Colmes on September 14, 2001, Mr Olson insists that his wife made the calls using the airline phone and over the course of the following years alternated his evidence between the two options.
We also know that until January 31, 2001 United Airlines had no air phones installed on any Boeing 757 and they were known to still be unreliable in September. Ted Olsen claimed his wife called him ‘collect,’ which to those of you outside America means she reversed the charges. Ask yourself how and then why? How do you reverse the charge on a cell phone and why would you do that in those circumstances, even if you could?
Then he claimed his wife had used the air phone instead to call him ‘collect,’ which you could not do in 2001 and cannot do today. Air phones need to be activated by swiping a credit card which is then charged for the call. We don’t really know what any of this means at all until, however, the FBI confirmed, a few years later, that Barbara Olson’s calls to her husband on that day lasted for exactly zero seconds.
Now it tells us something. It tells us that the esteemed U.S. Solicitor General had been lying. Repeatedly. Although it doesn’t tell us why and he clearly is not going to. Two more facts relating to the Olsons. Barbara Olson was Jewish and graduated from the Yeshiva University Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law. Her husband Ted was the prominent lawyer who represented an Israeli spy, and Mossad agent, Jonathan Pollard who was convicted by an American court in 1986 for passing top-secret information to Israel. He was sentenced to life in 1987 and remains in prison today. Both Olsons had close links to Mossad, the Israeli Secret Service.
One last thing in relation to the Olsons which involves doing your own research. Compare the similarities between Barbara Olson and Ted Olson’s new wife Lady Booth-Olson. (That is not a title, it is her Christian name) Compare their backgrounds, professional abilities and looks. And whilst you are doing that remember that no aircraft hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001 and so she should be alive and well somewhere. I draw no public conclusions here and only ask you to make your own. But, if you are thinking what I am thinking then why is that idea anymore far-fetched than what we are being led to believe by the official 9/11 Commission Report?